The Veteran's claim for a rating of 20 percent for right foot neuropathy, external popliteal and anterior tibial nerves was granted from the earlier effective date of July 16, 2023. Other claims were denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the Veteran's symptoms did not meet the criteria for a higher rating prior to July 16, 2023, but did support a 20 percent rating from that date forward.
- Claimed conditions
- right foot neuropathy, external popliteal and anterior tibial nerves, right foot pain status post Lisfranc fracture, bilateral plantar fascial fibromatosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 18, 2025
- Citation
- A25036042
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,188 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25036042.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for a bilateral foot disability due to insufficient medical evidence on file. A VA examination is needed to determine if his current foot disabilities are related to service, including aggravation of any pre-existing conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a medical examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's bilateral plantar fascial fibromatosis, which is currently not possible in-person. The AOJ should consider virtual options such as telehealth.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral plantar fascial fibromatosis is related to his service, specifically during periods of active duty, ACDUTRA, or INACDUTRA. The Veteran needs a VA examination to evaluate this condition and determine its etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection for left shoulder and right ankle arthritis, as well as his claim for bilateral plantar fascial fibromatosis due to a lack of VA examination records. The Veteran will be given another opportunity to attend examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.