The Board granted a separate 10 percent rating for plantar fasciitis and a separate 30 percent rating of bilateral claw foot (pes cavus), while denying increased ratings for the Veteran's bilateral flatfoot, left foot hallux valgus, and right foot hallux valgus.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the evidence did not support an increase in the rating for the Veteran's bilateral flatfoot beyond the maximum schedular rating of 50 percent. However, there was some relief from non-surgical treatment as it pertains to his plantar fasciitis and the criteria for a separate 10 percent rating were met. For the claw foot (pes cavus), the evidence supported a 30 percent rating. The Board denied increased ratings for the Veteran's left and right foot hallux valgus, as they did not meet the criteria for higher ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral flatfoot, plantar fasciitis (left foot), claw foot (pes cavus) bilateral, left foot hallux valgus, right foot hallux valgus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 21, 2025
- Citation
- A25036305
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 696 · Granted: 63% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25036305.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death during the pendency of the appeal. The Board cannot issue a decision on the merits as they have no jurisdiction.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew all appeals regarding his service-connected conditions and related disability ratings, effective as of March 16, 2026.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in considering all conditions and a need for an addendum opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's current right great toe / foot disability and his claimed frostbite injury.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed all appeals for service connection and increased rating claims due to untimely Notice of Disagreement submissions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.