Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Board remanded the appeal for further development and adjudication of higher ratings and effective dates for various peripheral neuropathies associated with NHL, as well as an earlier effective date for a TDIU rating.

The deciding factor: The issues are inextricably intertwined with another appeal and must be addressed concurrently.

Claimed conditions
Left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy associated with NHL, Right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy associated with NHL, Left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the sciatic nerve branch associated with NHL, Right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the sciatic nerve branch associated with NHL, Left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the femoral nerve branch associated with NHL, Right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the femoral nerve branch associated with NHL, Left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the obturator nerve associated with NHL, Right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the obturator nerve associated with NHL, Left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the external cutaneous nerve associated with NHL, Right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the external cutaneous nerve associated with NHL, Left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the ilio-inguinal nerve associated with NHL, Right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the ilio-inguinal nerve associated with NHL
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
April 30, 2025
Citation
A25039591

Veterans Law Judge

J. Abrams

Decisions by this judge: 252 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25039591.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.