The appeal for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on regular aid and attendance was dismissed as a matter of law because the Notice of Disagreement did not relate to an adjudicative determination by the agency of original jurisdiction.
The deciding factor: The October 2021 Notice of Disagreement was invalid as it did not address any adjudicative determination made by the AOJ, and thus the appeal for SMC based on regular aid and attendance was dismissed.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 12, 2025
- Citation
- A25042472
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.