The Board granted service connection for common variable immunoglobulin deficiency as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected sarcoidosis/pulmonary fibrosis (interstitial lung disease) with pulmonary hypertension, but remanded the claim for further development regarding pulmonary hypertension.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's common variable immunoglobulin deficiency was found to be proximately due to his service-connected sarcoidosis/pulmonary fibrosis (interstitial lung disease) with pulmonary hypertension. The Board remanded the claim for a new examination regarding pulmonary hypertension as it is a separate and distinct disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Common variable immunoglobulin deficiency, Pulmonary hypertension
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- May 19, 2025
- Citation
- A25044576
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,432 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25044576.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's respiratory disorder, including pulmonary hypertension, restrictive and obstructive lung diseases, sarcoidosis, and other conditions are remanded for further development to determine the nature and etiology of his service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for another VA medical opinion to address the Veteran's in-service toxic exposure, including asbestos and other claimed exposures.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and clarification of opinions regarding service connection for a heart disability, including atrial septal defect and pulmonary hypertension, as well as bilateral hearing loss.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's heart disorder, specifically whether it is related to her service-connected asthma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.