The Board remands the claim for service connection for residuals of bladder cancer to obtain a medical opinion regarding the Veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation and its potential link to his bladder cancer.
The deciding factor: Remand is necessary due to an inadequate VA medical opinion and to ensure compliance with 38 C.F.R. § 3.311, which requires referral of claims involving radiation exposure for an advisory medical opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of bladder cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Ionizing radiation
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 21, 2025
- Citation
- A25045603
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is entitled to an effective date of March 13, 2012, for his claim of entitlement to service connection for residuals of bladder cancer.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of bladder cancer are granted a disability rating of 60 percent, effective October 1, 2021.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a higher rating for residuals of bladder cancer and TDIU due to insufficient evidence.
- Granted
The Board granted an effective date of August 26, 2014, for the award of service connection for residuals of bladder cancer due to continuous pursuit of the claim.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.