The Board remands the claims for service connection for muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral and limb-girdle types, degenerating skeletal function of the right ankle, and degenerating skeletal function of the left ankle to obtain additional evidence.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner's opinion was found inadequate due to failure to consider the totality of the Veteran's medical history and etiology of his muscular dystrophy. Additionally, there is a need for an addendum opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's degenerating skeletal function of bilateral ankles.
- Claimed conditions
- muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral and limb-girdle types, degenerating skeletal function of the right ankle, degenerating skeletal function of the left ankle
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 29, 2025
- Citation
- A25047544
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.