The Board denied an initial compensable disability rating for fatty infiltration of the liver as there was no evidence of any liver symptomatology other than elevated liver enzymes.
The deciding factor: The criteria for a 10 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7345 have not been met, as there is no showing of malaise or anorexia, and incapacitating episodes have not been shown.
- Claimed conditions
- fatty infiltration of the liver
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 29, 2025
- Citation
- A25047776
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,500 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25047776.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for a liver disability, claimed as cirrhosis, and other disabilities including carcinoma of the abdominal cavity, kidney stones, psoriasis, bilateral knee disability, erectile dysfunction, acid reflux, and hiatal hernia. The Board found that these conditions are not related to service or service-connected disabilities.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus and its complications, have met the percentage requirements for a schedular TDIU since March 16, 2009. Competent evidence indicates that these conditions prevent him from obtaining and retaining substantially gainful employment consistent with his educational background and work experience.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities are rated at a combined 60 percent, and the Board denied his claim for TDIU as he does not meet the schedular requirements.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting medical evidence regarding the etiology of the veteran's current liver condition and a need for an examination to determine if his skin conditions are related to service exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.