Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board remands the claim for further development and adjudication of whether the overpayment was properly created, as well as any waiver request.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support the Veteran's assertion that she had active-duty service after February 2018, but the AOJ did not adequately develop the record to verify this information.

Claimed conditions
Not specified in this decision
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 5, 2025
Citation
A25049766

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.