The Board remands the claims for further development related to the Veteran's service as a nurse and potential radiation exposure.
The deciding factor: Remand is warranted to determine the Veteran's participation in any toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) and to obtain an opinion addressing her contention of radiation exposure while serving as a nurse.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral breast cancer, left breast reconstruction, secondary to bilateral breast cancer, right breast reconstruction, secondary to bilateral breast cancer, depression secondary to bilateral mastectomy, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, secondary to bilateral breast cancer, left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, secondary to bilateral breast cancer, status post bilateral mastectomy axillary lymph node dissection secondary to bilateral breast cancer, status post salpingo-oophorectomy secondary to bilateral breast cancer, left upper extremity lymphoma secondary to status post bilateral mastectomy axillary lymph node dissection, right upper extremity lymphoma secondary to status post bilateral mastectomy axillary lymph node dissection
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Ionizing radiation
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 13, 2025
- Citation
- A25052129
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 869 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25052129.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral breast cancer and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, finding no evidence of a direct link to the Veteran's active duty or that these conditions were caused by her service-connected multiple sclerosis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral breast cancer residuals due to herbicide exposure is being remanded as the VA medical opinions are inadequate and further development is needed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for brain tumor and bilateral breast cancer due to exposure at Camp Lejeune. Additional medical opinions are needed regarding the etiology of these conditions, as well as verification of any Vietnam service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's bilateral breast cancer and its relation to service, specifically herbicide exposure and/or Camp Lejeune contaminated water. The VA will obtain additional records and provide an addendum opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.