Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board granted service connection for cervical spine multilevel spondylosis with mild canal narrowing at C3-4 through C5-6, lumbar spine degenerative disc disease, right shoulder strain and tendinitis, left shoulder tendinitis and tendinosis, as well as secondary radiculopathies in the upper and lower extremities.

The deciding factor: The evidence is at least in equipoise that the Veteran's cervical spine multilevel spondylosis with mild canal narrowing at C3-4 through C5-6, lumbar spine degenerative disc disease, right shoulder strain and tendinitis, left shoulder tendinitis and tendinosis were caused by his active duty service.

Claimed conditions
cervical spine multilevel spondylosis with mild canal narrowing at C3-4 through C5-6, lumbar spine degenerative disc disease, right shoulder strain and tendinitis, left shoulder tendinitis and tendinosis, right upper extremity radiculopathy as secondary to cervical spine multilevel spondylosis with mild canal narrowing at C3-4 through C5-6, left upper extremity radiculopathy as secondary to cervical spine multilevel spondylosis with mild canal narrowing at C3-4 through C5-6, right lower extremity radiculopathy as secondary to lumbar spine degenerative disc disease, left lower extremity radiculopathy as secondary to lumbar spine degenerative disc disease
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 17, 2025
Citation
A25052912

Veterans Law Judge

J. NICHOLS

Decisions by this judge: 945 · Granted: 43% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25052912.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.