The Board remands the service connection claim for a stomach condition, including gastric ulcer and abdominal surgery with colostomy, due to a duty to assist error.
The deciding factor: An addendum opinion is needed as the previous medical opinions are inadequate due to missing in-service surgical records and other relevant evidence not addressed.
- Claimed conditions
- gastric ulcer, abdominal surgery with colostomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 25, 2025
- Citation
- A25054923
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to a prohibited concurrent election under VA claims processing rules.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for all claimed conditions as the evidence did not support a finding that any of these disabilities were incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
- Granted
The Board granted the motion for reversal of the May 1959 rating decision that denied service connection for a gastric ulcer based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
- Granted
The Board granted restoration of service connection for gastric ulcer, finding that the severance was improper due to a lack of clear and unmistakable error in the original decision.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.