The appeal is remanded to correct the AOJ's error in satisfying a regulatory or statutory duty regarding notice of the decision on the issue of entitlement to eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the July 2019 notice did not meet the criteria outlined in 38 U.S.C. �?5104(b) and therefore remanded the case to provide proper notice.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 27, 2025
- Citation
- A25055890
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.