The Board remands the issue of eligibility for enrollment in the PCAFC due to inadequate notice and missing records.
The deciding factor: The AOJ failed to comply with statutory criteria outlined in 38 U.S.C. § 5103 and 38 U.S.C. § 5104(b) regarding notification, and also did not associate the PCAFC application with the claims file.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 27, 2025
- Citation
- A25055964
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.