The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, Type II and remanded the claims for higher ratings for sciatic neuropathy, femoral neuropathy, PTSD, TDIU, SMC, and DEA benefits.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 20 percent. The claims for higher ratings were remanded due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Claimed conditions
- Diabetes mellitus, Type II, Sciatic neuropathy (right lower extremity), Sciatic neuropathy (left lower extremity), Sciatic neuropathy (left upper extremity), Sciatic neuropathy (right upper extremity), Femoral neuropathy (right lower extremity), Femoral neuropathy (left lower extremity), Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25057118
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,113 · Granted: 47% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25057118.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bladder cancer and diabetes mellitus, Type II are remanded due to errors in the VA opinion regarding exposure to herbicides and toxic substances during his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for PTSD, and the Court has ordered a remand due to the Veteran not being provided notice of his right to a hearing before the RO.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal of a proposed severance of service connection for peripheral neuropathy, secondary to diabetes mellitus type II (DM II), as it was not an adverse final decision by the AOJ.
- Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claims for service connection for congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus, Type II based on new and relevant evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.