The Board denied higher ratings for the Veteran's bilateral pes planus with metatarsalgia, finding that the evidence did not support a rating higher than 10 percent prior to April 22, 2024, and that a 50 percent rating was already in effect from that date.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's symptoms did not meet or more nearly approximate the criteria for higher ratings under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral pes planus with metatarsalgia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 27, 2025
- Citation
- A25092902
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 622 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25092902.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for lumbosacral strain and bilateral pes planus with metatarsalgia are remanded due to a duty to assist error. An addendum medical opinion is required to determine the nature and etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the AOJ for consideration of additional evidence, and a medical opinion regarding the etiology of calcaneal/osseous spurs.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral pes planus with metatarsalgia is granted a rating of 50 percent, but not higher.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development of his claims, including obtaining recent medical records from the Iowa City VAMC.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.