The Board remands the claim for service connection of an eye condition, including iridocyclitis and anterior uveitis/iritis, to obtain a new VA medical opinion and correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
The deciding factor: Remand is warranted due to an inadequate September 2024 VA medical opinion and missing VA treatment records relevant to the eye issue.
- Claimed conditions
- iridocyclitis, anterior uveitis/iritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 29, 2025
- Citation
- A25094127
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,890 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25094127.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for iridocyclitis as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected ankylosing spondylitis.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection of Dupuytren's contracture of the hands and feet, as well as ankylosing spondylitis and eczema/seborrhea. The appeal for iridocyclitis is remanded due to its inextricability with the other issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded to allow for additional development of his medical records, including VA treatment records from the Coatesville VA and SSA records. The Veteran will also be scheduled for examinations to determine whether he has an acquired psychiatric disability related to service or a service-connected condition, as well as whether his erectile dysfunction and left eye disorder are secondary to his inflammatory arthritis.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's current eye disabilities, including hyperopia/presbyopia, traumatic iritis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cataracts, dry eye syndrome/blepharitis, iridocyclitis, scleral abrasion, and lid and brow scars, were not incurred during or as a result of active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.