The Board remanded the issue of entitlement to eligibility for PCAFC benefits because the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team's (CEAT) review was legally inadequate under the correct statutory criteria established in Veteran Warriors, Inc. v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs. Upon remand, the CEAT must reevaluate whether the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision, protection, or instruction based on the statutory definition, considering evidence of his need for medication management assistance, self-preservation support, and fall risk management.
The deciding factor: The Board found the January 2021 CEAT review applied an incorrect legal standard for 'need for supervision, protection, or instruction' that was invalidated by the Federal Circuit in Veteran Warriors, and therefore remanded for reconsideration under the correct statutory criteria with proper articulation of medical facts and reasoning.
- Claimed conditions
- Parkinson's disease (service-connected)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 10, 2025
- Citation
- A25097414
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.