The Board remands the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a punctured lung to ensure that complete records from Yale Medicine are associated with the claims folder.
The deciding factor: The AOJ had a duty to advise the Veteran that a simple medical receipt did not satisfy the evidentiary requirements in this case, and that adjudication proceeded without consideration of all procurable evidence.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a punctured lung
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 12, 2025
- Citation
- A25097975
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,836 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25097975.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claim due to additional evidence being added to the file since the July 2020 Supplemental Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Appellant's petition to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for residuals of a punctured lung, finding that it was not incurred in line of duty and resulting from willful misconduct. The Veteran had consumed alcohol and driven while intoxicated, leading to an accident where he suffered injuries including a punctured lung.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have residuals of a punctured lung other than blunt trauma to the left chest with healed left rib fractures and left 8th rib deformity, nor is there evidence linking his current shortness of breath to service. Therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.