The Board granted restoration of the 10 percent disability rating for right knee limitation of flexion, status post meniscus tear/repair and granted initial ratings of 30 percent for right knee limitation of extension with painful motion and 20 percent for degenerative arthritis and disc disease with lumbar strain.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not establish an actual change in the severity of the disability, and the criteria for higher ratings were met based on the Veteran's range of motion and functional impairment.
- Claimed conditions
- right knee limitation of flexion, right knee limitation of extension with painful motion, degenerative arthritis and disc disease with lumbar strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 18, 2025
- Citation
- A25099895
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,455 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25099895.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's vertigo is granted as service-connected, and the other issues on appeal are denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of various service-connected conditions have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation in any of these cases.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that additional development is needed and the case is being remanded for issuance of a new supplemental statement of the case (SSOC). Relevant private and VA treatment records have been added to the claim file, necessitating this action.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for increased evaluations of bilateral knee and right ankle disabilities due to insufficient evidence from VA examinations. The Veteran's current range of motion measurements, symptoms, and related impairment must be evaluated without the ameliorative effects of medication used to treat his disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.