The Board granted service connection for tinnitus, resolving doubt in the Veteran's favor. The other claims are remanded due to a duty to assist error.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner's opinions were found inadequate as they did not acknowledge the Veteran's lay statements regarding onset of symptoms or injuries during service and were based solely on the absence of complaints in his service treatment records.
- Claimed conditions
- tinnitus, right elbow cubital tunnel syndrome, left elbow cubital tunnel syndrome, right wrist strain (claimed as wrist condition bilateral, tendonitis joints), left wrist strain (claimed as wrist condition bilateral, tendonitis joints), right hip strain (claimed as hip condition bilateral, tendonitis joints and pulled hamstrings), left hip strain (claimed as hip condition bilateral, tendonitis joints and pulled hamstrings), right knee degenerative arthritis (claimed as knee condition bilateral, tendonitis joints), left knee degenerative arthritis (claimed as knee condition bilateral, tendonitis joints), right ankle strain (claimed as ankle bilateral, tendonitis), left ankle strain (claimed as ankle bilateral, tendonitis), lumbosacral strain (claimed as back pain), bilateral pes planus (claimed as foot condition bilateral, fallen arches bilateral, tendonitis), nerve damage, legs and toes, left lower extremity, nerve damage, legs and toes, right lower extremity, generalized anxiety disorder (claimed as anxiety condition and sleep disturbances)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 18, 2025
- Citation
- A25100137
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 793 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25100137.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, arthritis, and memory loss. The decision found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus, finding that it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran experienced tinnitus during his active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.