The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, as there was no evidence supporting a compensable rating or service connection for any of the claimed conditions.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not support a compensable rating based on body area affected, visual acuity, or intermittent systemic therapy. Service connection was denied due to lack of in-service incurrence or aggravation and absence of a causal relationship between the current disabilities and service.
- Claimed conditions
- Onychomycosis, Tinea corporis, Bilateral keratoconus, Right fifth metacarpal fracture, Hypertension (HTN), Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 19, 2025
- Citation
- A25100399
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.