The Board denied the Veteran's service connection claim for hypokalemia, finding no evidence that it was related to his active duty service or secondary to a service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner's opinion was found inadequate due to insufficient consideration of the Veteran's medical records. However, there is still not persuasive evidence linking the condition to service or a service-connected disability.
- Claimed conditions
- hypokalemia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25103335
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,170 · Granted: 38% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25103335.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for dermatophytosis (tinea pedis and onychomycosis of the foot) with a rating of 30 percent, but denied service connection for multiple other conditions including hypokalemia, bilateral pes planus, cervical spine condition, left elbow condition, left foot hallux valgus, left hand condition, left hip condition, right hip condition, pain in left shoulder joint, right elbow condition, right hand condition, left extremity sciatica, right extremity sciatica, right knee condition, stomach issues, headaches, and obstructive sleep apnea.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance or housebound status is remanded due to a duty-to-assist error. The service connection claim for a back disability as secondary to his bilateral knee disabilities is also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for pulmonary venous hypertension, Lyme disease, and hypokalemia have been denied. The Board has found that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.,The Veteran's claim for cardiomyopathy is remanded due to an inadequate rationale in the previous VA opinion. A new examination is required to determine if his condition began during active service or is related to an incident of service, including documented cardiac symptoms.,The Veteran's claim for obstructive sleep apnea is also remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with his cardiomyopathy claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was caused by multiple conditions, including diabetes mellitus. The Board has remanded the case for a VA medical opinion to determine if the service-connected diabetes mellitus contributed to his death.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.