The Board remands the claim for service connection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach to obtain a VA examination addressing its nature and etiology.
The deciding factor: The August 2024 examination was inadequate, as it did not address the diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
- Claimed conditions
- adenocarcinoma of the stomach
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 9, 2025
- Citation
- A25105826
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,726 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25105826.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach, cancer status post gastrectomy due to lack of a causal relationship with the Veteran's service-connected PTSD, panic disorder, alcohol use disorder, and stimulant use disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the cause of death and exposure to herbicides.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for recurrent gastritis, as he did not report for a scheduled VA examination. The case is being returned to obtain updated VA treatment records and schedule the Veteran for an examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's death was caused by exposure to herbicide agents. The VA examiner did not provide an opinion on the underlying cause of death or etiological relationship.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.