The Board denied service connection for a bilateral eye disability, diagnosed as bilateral glare sensitivity, finding no evidence of a superimposed injury or disease during active service and that the condition was not attributable to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's current bilateral eye disability, diagnosed as bilateral glare sensitivity, was not shown to be related to his in-service PRK surgery due to the lack of evidence of a superimposed injury or disease during active service and the onset many years after service.

Claimed conditions

bilateral eye disability (claimed as halo eyes)

How they argued it

Direct service connection

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

December 9, 2025

Citation

A25105830

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine