The Board finds that new and relevant evidence has been received sufficient to readjudicate the previously denied claim of service connection for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

The deciding factor: The evidence is new and relevant, as it tends to prove or disprove a matter at issue in the claim, and thus readjudication of the claim is appropriate.

Claimed conditions

benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

How they argued it

Reopened with new and material evidence

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

December 10, 2025

Citation

A25106232

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine