The Board remands the claims for an earlier effective date for a 100 percent rating of loss of use both hands, special monthly compensation based on loss of use of both hands, and allowance for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
The deciding factor: The September 2022 examinations report was found inadequate due to the ameliorative effects of medications not being considered; a remand is necessary to obtain an addendum opinion regarding such effects retrospective throughout 2016.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of use both hands with Dupuytren's contracture both thumbs, both index fingers, both long fingers, both ring fingers, both little fingers, diabetic neuropathy and bradykinesia, tremors, muscle rigidity and stiffness both upper extremities
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 11, 2025
- Citation
- A25107288
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,185 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25107288.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for an addendum VA opinion to address the ameliorative effects of medication on the Veteran's bilateral hand disabilities from 2016 to 2022.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The appeal is granted as his PTSD is now considered service-connected.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection of a left leg disability is reopened, and the appeal is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.