The appeal was granted for service connection for latent tuberculosis and dermatitis of the face, while other claims were denied.
The deciding factor: New evidence was found relevant to support the readjudication of the back condition claim, but not for the others due to lack of new and relevant evidence.
- Claimed conditions
- back condition (claimed as lumbosacral strain with scoliosis, also claimed as low back pain), left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, paresthesias of feet, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, head trauma, also claimed as new Navy hazing, left hand and/or finger condition, also claimed as new vibration injury and Navy hazing, left shoulder, also claimed as uneven shoulders and as Navy hazing, left wrist condition, also claimed as new vibration injury and Navy hazing, right hip condition, also claimed as Navy hazing, right hand and/or finger condition, now claimed as new vibration injury and Navy hazing, right shoulder condition, now claimed as uneven shoulders and as Navy hazing, right wrist condition, now claimed as new vibration injury and Navy hazing, cervical spine condition, now claimed as with pain and stiffness and Navy hazing, latent tuberculosis, dermatitis of the face
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 22, 2025
- Citation
- A25110061
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 945 · Granted: 43% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25110061.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to a duty to assist error, specifically regarding the Veteran's exposure to mercury in dental amalgams and asbestos during service. A VA medical opinion is needed to determine if these exposures are related to his claimed disabilities.
- Dismissed
The appeal concerning earlier effective dates for service connection and disability ratings has been dismissed.,No new evidence or arguments were provided to support the claims.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted service connection. The Board finds the evidence insufficient to grant service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, prostate condition, headaches, IBS, behavioral neurology conditions, and acquired psychological condition due to exposure at Camp Lejeune.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has identified a pre-decisional duty to assist error and is remanding the claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to the Veteran's claim being raised prior to December 2024, despite not being adjudicated in that decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.