The Veteran's valvular heart disease resulted in a workload of greater than 5 METs but not greater than 7 METs, causing dyspnea, fatigue, angina, or dizziness. The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 30 percent as the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under the applicable VA regulations.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's valvular heart disease resulted in a workload of greater than 5 METs but not greater than 7 METs, which is consistent with his current rating of 30 percent. The evidence does not support an increase to any higher rating based on the criteria provided by VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- Valvular heart disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- January 6, 2026
- Citation
- 26000098
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 26000098.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for heart condition was granted with an effective date of August 1, 2019. The decision is based on evidence showing exposure to diesel and gas fuel during service.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted an earlier effective date of January 9, 2023 for a 70% evaluation for PTSD with alcohol use disorder and for individual unemployability.
- Granted
The Board has granted a 100 percent rating for the Veteran's coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease with a presence of coronary stent since February 4, 2022, based on workload of 3.0 METs or less resulting in heart failure symptoms.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA medical opinions regarding the Veteran's heart condition. The case will be reviewed again with a new opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.