The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 was denied because the VA treatment did not cause any new or additional disability, and there is no evidence that HCTZ caused his dehydration or TIA.
The deciding factor: VA treatment did not result in a qualifying additional disability as defined by 38 C.F.R. § 3.361
- Claimed conditions
- Neurocognitive disorder, Memory loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 4, 2026
- Citation
- 26001634
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 26001634.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's request to readjudicate his claims for service connection for PTSD (claimed as schizophrenia), headaches, and schizophrenia. The claim for memory loss and residuals of head injury remains denied due to lack of new and relevant evidence.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by difluoroethane poisoning, which is deemed an accident. The Board found that the cause of death is proximately due to his service-connected major depressive disorder with anxious distress and neurocognitive disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure of VA's duty to assist, specifically regarding the lack of a toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) opinion for the Veteran's major vascular neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance. The claim will be reconsidered in light of this new information.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's need for supervision, protection, or instruction on a continuous basis due to memory loss and the need for back surgery has been recognized. The Board has granted a Level 2 stipend under VA's PCAFC program.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.