Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the case to correct a duty to assist error and obtain adequate medical opinions regarding the veteran's erectile dysfunction.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's lay testimony alone is insufficient to establish service connection, and the VA opinions of record are not sufficient to deny the claim at this time.
- Claimed conditions
- erectile dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25000107
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.