Partly granted
The veteran's claim for a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction was denied. The claims for higher ratings for sciatic radiculopathy were remanded.
The deciding factor: The evidence is persuasively against the assignment of a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction, and there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error regarding the sciatic radiculopathy claims.
- Claimed conditions
- erectile dysfunction, sciatic radiculopathy of the right lower extremity, sciatic radiculopathy of the left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2025
- Citation
- A25002354
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.