The Board remanded the Veteran's claims for disability ratings due to missed examinations and hearings. The Veteran must undergo new VA examinations.
The deciding factor: The Veteran failed to appear for scheduled VA examinations and hearings, and it is unclear if he was properly notified of the consequences.
- Claimed conditions
- right fifth metatarsal, status post-surgery, iliotibial band friction syndrome of the right knee, iliotibial band friction syndrome of the left knee, acromioclavicular separation of the left shoulder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2025
- Citation
- A25002397
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,081 · Granted: 38% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25002397.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have rendered him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation, warranting the grant of a TDIU.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus and iliotibial band friction syndrome of the right knee, finding that both conditions are at least as likely as not related to active duty.,Service connection was denied for an acquired psychiatric disability due to lack of a current diagnosis.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and an increased evaluation for his left shoulder disability. The Board found that there was no evidence of a permanent increase in hearing acuity during service, and thus the presumption of aggravation did not apply. For the left shoulder disability, the VA examiner opined that the pre-existing condition likely worsened due to noise exposure during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination and consideration of the claim with consideration of Fenderson v. West.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.