The Board denied the veteran's appeal for a rating higher than 10% for his right wrist condition. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing ankylosis or its functional equivalent.

The deciding factor: The Board found no evidence of ankylosis or the functional equivalent of ankylosis involving the right wrist, and thus denied the appeal.

Claimed conditions

residuals navicular fracture, right wrist, posttraumatic arthritis

How they argued it

Direct service connection

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

10%

Decision date

January 16, 2025

Citation

A25004447

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine