The Board denied the veteran's claims for an earlier effective date and a higher rating for hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy, stating that the March 2010 decision was not in error.
The deciding factor: The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the March 2010 rating decision.
- Claimed conditions
- hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 21, 2025
- Citation
- A25004652
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 699 · Granted: 12% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25004652.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for service connection for tinnitus and for increase in rating for dry eye syndrome and exophthalmos due to procedural issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including an examination to assess his employability and consideration of whether he meets the criteria for a TDIU on an extraschedular basis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy is not adequately controlled despite medication use, and he claims his condition has worsened. The case is being remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his hypertension.
- Whole decision: Denied
The VA denied an increased disability evaluation for hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy, effective as of December 14, 1995, but prior to January 12, 1998, finding that the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the old criteria for hypertensive heart disease and hypertensive vascular disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.