Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for a 10 percent evaluation based on multiple service-connected disabilities, service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, and initial compensable evaluations for erectile dysfunction and papillary urothelial carcinoma. The Board found errors in the duty to assist and ordered additional actions.
The deciding factor: The Board remanded the claims due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors and the need for additional medical opinions.
- Claimed conditions
- multiple, noncompensable service-connected disabilities, diabetes mellitus type II, erectile dysfunction, papillary urothelial carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 22, 2025
- Citation
- A25005325
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.