The Board granted service connection for a heart condition, resolving all doubt in the Veteran's favor.
The deciding factor: Service connection was granted based on the evidence showing that the Veteran's heart condition is related to his active duty service, with the benefit of the doubt resolved in his favor.
- Claimed conditions
- coronary artery disease (heart condition)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- October 1, 2025
- Citation
- A25084731
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 696 · Granted: 63% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25084731.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer and heart condition, finding no evidence of a causal relationship to service or herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for multinodular goiter and coronary artery disease due to potential exposure to radioactive materials during service. The AOJ must determine if the Veteran was exposed to radiation, and a VA examination is needed to assess whether his conditions are related to his service.
- Denied
The Veteran's heart condition was initially rated at 10 percent prior to December 11, 2020 and increased to 60 percent from that date. The Board found the evidence did not support a higher rating for either period.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.