The Board remands the claims for service connection for pleomorphic adenoma and nerve damage, to include painful scar as secondary to pleomorphic adenoma, due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The deciding factor: Remand is required to provide the Veteran with a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his pleomorphic adenoma and to ensure complete VA treatment records are associated with the claims file.
- Claimed conditions
- pleomorphic adenoma, nerve damage, to include painful scar as secondary to pleomorphic adenoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25085170
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,963 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25085170.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for pleomorphic adenoma has been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The case is now remanded for further development regarding possible radiation exposure during service.
- Granted
The veteran's claims for dental trauma, rosacea, adult acne, chloracne, and pleomorphic adenoma as a result of herbicide exposure were all granted. Service connection was established for residuals of dental trauma to tooth number 8 due to in-service injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered additional development to determine if the veteran's pre-existing salivary gland tumor was aggravated by service in 1999, and whether any of his current conditions were incurred or aggravated during active military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.