The Veteran's claim for an initial rating of 20 percent for bilateral dry eye with left eye corneal opacities and recurrent corneal erosion was granted, while the claims for a 10 percent evaluation based upon multiple, noncompensable, service-connected disabilities, and initial compensable ratings for left hand post-traumatic arthritis long finger, little finger, and ring finger were denied. The claim for service connection for a bilateral foot disability was remanded.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the evidence showing that the Veteran's bilateral eye condition met the criteria for a 20 percent rating, while other claims did not meet the necessary criteria or required further development.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral dry eye with left eye corneal opacities and recurrent corneal erosion, Left hand post-traumatic arthritis long finger, Left hand post-traumatic arthritis little finger, Left hand post-traumatic arthritis ring finger, Bilateral foot disability (also claimed as bilateral pes planus with hallux valgus and bilateral foot arthritis of MTP joint and bilateral big toe pain)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- October 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25085321
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,455 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25085321.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.