The Board denied service connection for a skin disability, claimed as chloracne, due to the lack of evidence showing a current diagnosis and no in-service incurrence or aggravation. The claims for right lower extremity (RLE) and left lower extremity (LLE) diabetic peripheral neuropathy were remanded for further development.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no competent medical evidence supporting the Veteran's claim of a skin disability, including chloracne, during the appeal period. The claims for RLE and LLE diabetic peripheral neuropathy were remanded due to an incomplete record regarding in-service toxic exposure events.
- Claimed conditions
- skin disability, claimed as chloracne, right lower extremity (RLE) diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity (LLE) diabetic peripheral neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25085472
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.