The Board denied a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for lumbosacral strain with spondylolisthesis based on the current evidence.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating as there was no evidence showing forward flexion between 30 and 60 degrees, muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or spinal contour.
- Claimed conditions
- lumbosacral strain with spondylolisthesis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 7, 2025
- Citation
- A25086525
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,164 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25086525.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The veteran's PTSD with TBI was rated at 100% from August 1, 2022 to March 19, 2023. The veteran also qualifies for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on housebound criteria.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claims for higher ratings for left and right lower extremity radiculopathy were denied. The claim for a higher rating for lumbosacral strain with spondylolisthesis was remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is not service-connected due to a remand for further examination and opinion. The lumbosacral strain with spondylolisthesis claim must be remanded as VA did not obtain all relevant private treatment records. The left elbow disability claim also requires additional examination.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a clothing allowance for menthol/M-salicylate topical cream and capsaicin cream is denied as there is no service-connected skin condition, and the creams do not cause irreparable damage to his outer garments.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.