Remanded (sent back)PACT Act
The Board remands the claim for a menstrual disorder to obtain an adequate etiological opinion addressing whether the Veteran's condition is related to service, including her TERAs.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner failed to provide an adequate rationale for their negative opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's menstrual disorder and did not adequately address the in-service symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- menstrual disorder, including menorrhagia, status post hysterectomy with residuals of pain and ovarian cysts
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 14, 2025
- Citation
- A25088062
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.