The Board remands the claim for service connection of diabetes type 2 due to an inadequate medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's mental health disability and his diabetes.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opinions provided were found to be inadequate as they did not address potential aggravation by a mental health disability or obesity as an intermediate step, using an invalidated standard for causation.
- Claimed conditions
- Diabetes type 2
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 20, 2025
- Citation
- A25090045
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25090045.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided the first issue and denied a higher evaluation for DDD with lumbar strain. The second issue of service connection for diabetes type 2 as secondary to service-connected disabilities, including obesity as an intermediate step, is remanded due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Denied
The Board denied earlier effective dates for service connection and ratings for various diabetic conditions, as the earliest possible date under the PACT Act was August 10, 2022.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's hypertension is being remanded for further examination and opinion regarding its relationship to his service-connected diabetes type 2, as well as whether it was caused by herbicide exposure during service. The case will also be examined for direct service connection based on herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Board found that VA's failure to refill the Veteran's Plavix prescription did not result in additional disability that caused his death.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.