The Board denied a disability rating in excess of 90 percent for the service-connected open-angle glaucoma, but granted special monthly compensation based on need for aid and attendance.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's visual acuity was found to be at least 20/200 in one eye and 5/200 or worse in the other, meeting the criteria for a 90 percent disability rating under Diagnostic Codes 6013-6065.
- Claimed conditions
- open-angle glaucoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 90%
- Decision date
- January 2, 2026
- Citation
- A26000116
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26000116.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a compensable disability rating for open-angle glaucoma is remanded due to a duty to assist error.,The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than April 26, 2021, for the award of a 100 percent rating for respiratory disability is also remanded due to a duty to assist error.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claim for service connection for open-angle glaucoma, secondary to diabetes mellitus, type II. The claims for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension were granted under the PACT Act.,Service connection was established for diabetes mellitus, type II and hypertension based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents while stationed at Takhli Royal Thailand Air Force Base (RTAFB).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable rating for diabetic nonproliferative retinopathy and TDIU due to ongoing eye examinations and treatment records being needed. The issues are related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied service connection for a back disability and open-angle glaucoma, finding no evidence of in-service injury or disease. The skin disorder claim is remanded due to lack of medical opinion.,Service connection was also denied for bilateral hearing loss, with the VA examiner concluding that current hearing loss is not related to in-service noise exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.