The Board has decided that the Veteran is eligible for PCAFC benefits but needs further clarification on the level of stipend (Level 1 or Level 2) based on his specific needs. The case is being remanded to determine this.
The deciding factor: The decision was not comprehensive enough and overlooked certain medical evidence regarding the Veteran's need for personal care services and supervision.
- Claimed conditions
- Total Left Side Paralysis, Right Eye Blindness, Left Eye Peripheral Vision Limitations
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 5, 2026
- Citation
- A26000700
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26000700.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of right eye blindness is granted.,The Veteran's claim for SMC based on loss of use of the right eye is granted.,The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 40 percent for right eye blindness prior to January 13, 2014 remains pending and will be remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for right eye blindness due to new and material evidence. The case is remanded for further development, including obtaining treatment records and providing an addendum opinion.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected right eye disability has prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, and the Board granted his TDIU on an extra-schedular basis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and fairly consider the merits of the Veteran's claims, including updated VA treatment records, a VA psychiatric examination for PTSD, an eye examination for right eye blindness, a VA hypertension examination, and another knee examination. The TDIU claim is also remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.