The Veteran's appeal was dismissed because the Board Appeal request was not timely filed within one year of the rating decisions issued on June 25, 2024, and September 11, 2024. The Veteran did not provide good cause for the late filing.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to untimely filing as she did not file her Board Appeal request within one year of the rating decisions issued on June 25, 2024, and September 11, 2024.
- Claimed conditions
- left wrist and hand disability, right upper extremity radiculopathy, a right hand and fingers disability, and a right wrist disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 14, 2026
- Citation
- A26003793
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26003793.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a left wrist and hand disability, as well as her claim for bilateral hearing loss due to incomplete development of records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to missing service treatment records and a VA audiological examination, as well as for an opinion on the etiology of hearing loss.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a VA examination to determine whether the Veteran's current left wrist and hand disability is caused or aggravated by his service-connected left ring finger disability, including any additional disability sustained due to May 2012 treatment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the appeal to the RO for additional procedural development, including scheduling a video conference hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at VA's facility. The Veteran was sent letters with his current address in Omaha, Nebraska, but they were returned as undeliverable. The RO should attempt to contact the Veteran's attorney to ascertain his current address and contact information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.