Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for a compensable disability rating for tension headaches and service connection for ED were denied. The claim of entitlement to service connection for diarrhea was dismissed due to the AOJ decision deferring the issue.,The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for sleep apnea, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and bilateral plantar fasciitis.

The deciding factor: For tension headaches, the evidence did not demonstrate characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in two months over the last several months.,For ED, there were no assertions or evidence of removal of glans penis or complete atrophy of both testes. The next compensable rating is for these conditions.,The AOJ decision deferring a decision on the claim of entitlement to service connection for diarrhea was not a final decision by the AOJ as it provided information regarding future action on that claim.,For sleep apnea, remand is necessary due to pre-decisional duty to assist error. The AOJ must attempt to obtain medical records related to the Veteran's sleep studies between October 2020 and December 2021.,For atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, remand is necessary as the VA opinion used the proximate cause standard instead of addressing whether the Veteran's condition was caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD. The examiner must address this issue in their opinion.,For bilateral plantar fasciitis, remand is necessary due to pre-decisional duty to assist error. The AOJ must obtain an adequate medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral plantar fasciitis.

Claimed conditions
tension headaches, erectile dysfunction (ED), diarrhea, sleep apnea, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, bilateral plantar fasciitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 15, 2026
Citation
A26004252

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26004252.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.