The Veteran's stress fractures of the left second and third metatarsals are granted a 30% disability rating since November 9, 2022.,The Veteran's left ankle sprain status post arthrotomy is denied for increased ratings.,Service connection for hypertension cannot be established without a current VA examination. The claim is denied.,Service connection for the left knee disability cannot be established without a current VA examination. The claim is denied.,Service connection for hemorrhoids cannot be established without a current VA examination. The claim is denied.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder other than an alcohol-related disorder (claimed) cannot be established without a current VA examination. The claim is denied.,Service connection for an alcohol-related disorder (claimed) cannot be established without a current VA examination. The claim is denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence is in equipoise as to whether the stress fractures of the left second and third metatarsals have been manifested by severe symptomatology since November 9, 2023.,The evidence persuasively weighs against a finding that there was an increase in disability in the left toes disability during the one-year period prior to the date of claim, November 9, 2023.,The evidence is in equipoise as to whether from November 9, 2022, to November 8, 2023, the fractures of the left second and third metatarsals were manifested by severe symptomatology.,The evidence persuasively shows that hypertension cannot be established without a current VA examination.,There was no good cause for the Veteran's failure to report for the VA examinations in October 2024 and November 2024 scheduled in conjunction with his claim for entitlement to service connection for hypertension.,The evidence persuasively weighs against a finding that there was good cause for the Veteran's failure to report for the VA examination in November 2024 scheduled in conjunction with his claim for entitlement to service connection for a left knee disability.,There is no conclusive pathophysiology or etiology of hypertension, and it does not have features such as fatigue, pain, disability out of proportion to physical findings, and inconsistent demonstration of laboratory abnormalities.,The evidence persuasively weighs against a finding that the Veteran's hypertension was related to active service, including in-service exposure to burn pits, fine particulate matter, and other environmental toxins.,There is no conclusive pathophysiology or etiology of the left knee disability, and it does not have features such as fatigue, pain, disability out of proportion to physical findings, and inconsistent demonstration of laboratory abnormalities.,The evidence persuasively weighs against a finding that the Veteran's left knee disability was related to active service, including in-service exposure to burn pits, fine particulate matter, and other environmental toxins.,There is no conclusive pathophysiology or etiology of hemorrhoids, and it does not have features such as fatigue, pain, disability out of proportion to physical findings, and inconsistent demonstration of laboratory abnormalities.
- Claimed conditions
- stress fractures of the left second and third metatarsals, left ankle sprain status post arthrotomy, hypertension, left knee disability, hemorrhoids, anxiety disorder (claimed), alcohol-related disorder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 21, 2026
- Citation
- A26005377
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26005377.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his bilateral knee and hip disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.