Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that the VA decision denying enrollment in the PCAFC program was not based on a proper application of the law and regulations, specifically regarding the definition of 'supervision, protection, or instruction' under 38 C.F.R. § 71.15. The Board therefore remands the case for further action.

The deciding factor: The VA decision did not provide an adequate clinical determination and decision as to whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the PCAFC program, which was required by regulation.

Claimed conditions
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), urinary frequency, bilateral pes planus with fasciitis status post bilateral great toe bunionectomy, sleep apnea, right (dominant) shoulder degenerative joint disease (DJD) and rotator cuff tendonitis status post arthroscopy residuals, traumatic brain injury (TBI), right upper extremity radiculopathy of the upper radicular nerve, left shoulder DJD rotator cuff tendonitis status post arthroscopy residuals, hemorrhoids, shoulder surgery scars, tension migraine, cervical degenerative joint disease (DDD) intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS), lumbosacral degenerative joint disease (DDD) intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS), left and right lower extremity radiculopathy of the sciatic nerve, right and left epicondylitis, right and left wrist strain, right and left limitation of motion of the thumb, iliopsoas tendonitis of the right and left hips, right and left patellar syndrome, right and left achilles tendonitis, dry eye condition, tinnitus, pseudofolliculitis, left and right hand finger sprain of the little and ring fingers, left and right hip limitation of flexion, impairment of the thigh
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 21, 2026
Citation
A26005634

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26005634.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.