The Board has restored special monthly compensation (SMC) based on a need for regular aid and attendance, which was previously discontinued due to the Veteran not having a single service-connected disability rated at 100 percent. The decision finds that the AOJ improperly applied the applicable laws and regulations in severing SMC.
The deciding factor: The AOJ failed to correctly apply the applicable laws and regulations in its December 2024 rating decision, which indicated that the discontinuance of SMC based on a regular need for aid and attendance was due to the fact that the Veteran did not have a single service-connected disability rated at 100 percent. The Board found this reasoning insufficient as it does not address the actual basis for the May 2023 grant of SMC, which is the Veteran's factual need for regular aid and attendance.
- Claimed conditions
- Regular Aid and Attendance
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 2, 2026
- Citation
- A26009543
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26009543.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the appellant's claim for an earlier effective date of January 31, 2008, for the grant of death pension benefits based on the need for regular aid and attendance.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.